City of Collinsville Planning Commission met Dec. 9.
Here are the minutes provided by the commission:
Vice Chairman Bechtle calls the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. with the following members present and answering roll call: Chairman Forneris (virtual), Bechtle, Illies, Jackstadt, Rayho (virtual).
Absent: Popov, Klein
Also present: Community Development Director Taylor, Senior Planner Yancey, City Engineer Turner, and Recording Secretary Robinson.
SPEAKERS FROM THE FLOOR:
None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Motion to approve the November 18, 2021, Planning Commission meeting minutes made by Rayho, seconded by Jackstadt.
Vote: Ayes 4 (Bechtle, Illies, Jackstadt, Rayho); Abstain 1 (Forneris).
Motion Approved.
PUBLIC HEARING:
TA 21-04 Amarok LLC (Text Amendment)
Motion to Open Public Hearing made by Illies, seconded by Jackstadt.
Vote: All Ayes (5-0). Motion Approved.
Community Development Director presents a request to amend zoning ordinance Section 17.060.050 – Fence or Wall, Accessory use, in order to allow wire, security fencing. He provides a background of the request for amendment, various photos, and zoning analysis. He advises that Staff recommends Approval with a few minor changes. These include:
F. Exception; Wire, security alarm fencing on non-residentially zoned properties. A wire fence for the purpose of alarmed security may be constructed on non-residentially zoned properties subject to each of the following criteria being satisfied:
1. Fence may be constructed in the following district CP-1, CP-3, BP-1, BP-3, BP-4, and M-1.
2. Fence shall be constructed behind/inside an approved fence, wall, or barrier which meets all the requirements for fencing noted above.
3. Fence may be erected to a height of eight (8) feet.
4. Fence may be connected to a power source but shall not be electrified in any manner which administers a shock when touched by human or animal.
Jackstadt asks that if United Rental meets the City’s requirements. Taylor explains that the photos are strictly an example of the fence, not what is existing at this business.
Bechtle asks if the Commission members should include more language than just wire, i.e. gauge, and if this should be located in all of the districts that the City presented.
Illies asks for clarification if the Commission would review these as they go through. Taylor explains that fencing is reviewed and approved by Staff. They discuss the legal aspects of reviews in general.
1. The Commission discuss eliminating some zones.
2. Jackstadt has concerns with wording but will speak with applicant when sworn in.
3. Change language “may be erected to a maximum of eight (8) feet”.
4. All Commission agrees with wording.
Cindy Williams responds to the podium and is sworn in stating her name and address. Bechtle asks for gauges of wire that the company uses and if the company uses any different size wire. She advises no, only one standard size. Cindy advises that there is no shock. Jackstadt asks what the company or fencing industry terms this type of fence. She states it is called perimeter burglar alarm system. It has to be disturbed for more than 5.5 seconds. She defines disturbed after Jackstadt asks. She states if someone grabs the wire or touches the wire for 5.5 seconds, a signal will be sent. Illies asks for the correct terminology to use for the ordinance. “Wire monitored alarm system”. Cindy explains that the distance between the exterior fence and this fence will have to be 3-12 inches but shas to be two (2) feet taller than the existing fence.
Forneris asks if there are sensitivity sets for weather events. Cindy explains yes, the 5.5 seconds provides that. Forneris then asks if the gate is the exposure point. Cindy advises that no, the gate is a three (3) inch section, and it moves with the gate. Cindy discusses why they brought the text amendment forward, but feasibility. Forneris asks that the twelve (12) inches should be the maximum.
New title – Wire Monitored Alarm System
Non-residentially zoned properties striked
Fence m-1 by right, may be allowed in other non-residential subject to pc approval
2 stays same, but add no greater the 12 inches behind/inside the perimeter fence
3 same adding maximum
4 same
5 – wires shall be of a gauge that are not easily visible from public rights-of-way.
Motion to Close Public Hearing made by Illies, seconded by Rayho.
Vote: All Ayes (5-0). Motion Approved.
Motion to recommend Approval with the following corrections:
made by Illies, seconded by Jackstadt.
Roll Call Vote: All ayes (5-0).
Motion Approved.
RZ 21-10 & SP 21-07 Total Access Urgent Care and Starbucks Drive-Through (Rezoning & Site Plan) Motion to Open Public Hearing made by Jackstadt, seconded by Illies.
Vote: All Ayes (5-0). Motion Approved.
Senior Planner Yancey presents a request by Moto, Inc to amend an existing “P-B-4” Planned Commercial District for property located at 400 Beltline Rd. and a request for Site Plan approval in order to permit the development of a Total Access Urgent Care and Starbucks Drive-Through. She gives a brief history of the property and shows existing site conditions. She presents the deviations the applicant is requesting and zoning analysis. She presents the Site Plan proposal.
Staff is recommending Approval with the following conditions:
1. That the eastern-most access point along Beltline Rd. be limited to right-in/right-out; and,
2. That the access along Vandalia St. be limited to right-out only.
Jackstadt asks for comparison of parking sizes. Staff advises that both buildings will have nine (9) foot parking spaces. Illies asks for the City Engineers opinion on stormwater. He advises that it is more than what the car wash had, but less than what is present currently. Illies suggests the elimination of the 3 spaces in the middle and use for a swale.
Commission members discuss the entrances and directions. Forneris asks about IDOT’s concurrence to the traffic study. City Engineer Turner advises yes, they were. Forneris asks for clarification of the Vandalia entrance/exit and why the City would allow it now, if only to have IDOT change it in a few years. Staff and Commission discuss options. Forneris asks if the signals are compliant with pedestrian traffic. Turner states that Vandalia is, Beltline is not. Turner explains that IDOT would not entertain it.
The Commission and Staff discuss the fence proposed on the south side of the property. Yancey advises that it is a six (6) foot solid vinyl fence. They discuss lighting on the properties.
The Commission and Staff discuss the TAUC elevations, specifically the cornice tower.
The Commission and Staff discuss the Starbucks elevations. Rayho advises his concerns for the north elevations. Illies gives some recommendations for changes, including wrapping windows around to the north elevation, continuing the awning around the corner to the drive-through area.
Bryan Pendleton responds to the podium and is sworn in stating his name and address. He introduces himself. Pendleton, Staff, and the Commission members discuss the three (3) spots in the middle of the property and potential traffic conflicts.
Dustin Riechmann responds to the podium and is sworn in stating his name and address. He continues by answering questions reference the traffic study in relation to the middle entrance, specifically the three (3) spots in the middle of the property used for the urgent care.
David Staley responds to the podium and is sworn in stating his name and address. He speaks about stormwater options and non-options. Illies states that he still is concerned and will probably make the elimination of one parking spot contingent for approval.
Matt Bruckel responds to the podium and is sworn in stating his name and address. He states that the meeting feels similar to a colonoscopy he recently had. Then continues, stating he is disappointed responding in front of Planning Commission, still having concerns. Illies expresses his concerns about the cornice tower. Matt states his building receives compliments on all sides of his buildings. Illies and the applicant, very loudly discuss the rear of the parapet. Matt advises that he has been working with the City for eight (8) months and this is expensive. He claims multiple things. Travis advises that the only reason this is allowed on the property is the rezoning of the planned district. Illies advises the applicant is being very contentious. They argue back and forth.
Matt again says he doesn’t understand that after eight months, why does he have to change it. The Commission members state that the tower is a part of the west elevation, and it should be treated as such. Taylor advises that Bryan and Moto are the applicants and the City is working with them. Matt and multiple people leave the building. The Commission members discuss the tower and requirements.
Bryan discusses the Starbucks elevations. He states that the far right of the North elevation is prep area. He cannot add windows but will entertain bringing the wood around and other possible options.
Motion to Close Public Hearing made by Illies, seconded by Rayho.
Vote: All Ayes (5-0). Motion Approved.
Motion to recommend Rezoning contingent on Site Plan Approval is made by Rayho, seconded by Roll Call Vote: All Ayes (5-0).
Motion Approved.
Motion to Approve Site Plan with the following conditions:
Site Plan Total Access Urgent Care
- Parapet 3rd wall is required on the west facing elevation.
- Western most parking spot in the middle of the parking lot removed.
Site Plan – Starbucks
Motion made by Illies, seconded by Jackstadt.
Roll Call Vote: All Ayes (5-0).
Motion Approved.
NEW BUSINESS:
SPACK 21-08 Collinsville Mini Mart (Sign Package)
Community Development Director Taylor presents a request for sign package approval in order to permit the installation of two (2) flush-mounted and twelve (12) fuel pump graphics at 601 West Main. Staff is recommending approval.
Motion to Approve made by Rayho, seconded by Illies.
Roll Call Vote: All Ayes (5-0).
Motion Approved.
SPACK 21-07 Rightway Seamless Gutters and Contracting (Sign Package)
Community Development Director Taylor presents a request for sign package approval in order to permit one (1) freestanding monument sign at 514 West Main. Staff is recommending approval.
The applicant, Ashley, responds to the podium. She speaks about the monument sign and answers questions from the Commission members.
Motion to Approve with the condition that the roof underside be enclosed made by Rayho, seconded by Jackstadt. Roll Call Vote: All Ayes (5-0).
Motion Approved.
OFFICER ELECTIONS
Rayho makes a nomination to continue with the current officers, Forneris as Chair, and Bechtle as Vice Chair. Vote: All Ayes (5-0).
OLD BUSINESS:
None
PRESENTATIONS:
Stormwater Presentation
City Engineer Turner presents the MS4 Stormwater presentation to the Planning Commission.
STAFF REPORT:
Community Development Director Taylor advises that the Zoning Practice Report for December is reference practice zoning minimalism.
Bechtle asks for further information about Staff reviewing Site Plans and Sign Packages in the future rather than Planning Commission review. The Commission and Staff discuss reasons and possibilities for this move.
COMMENTS FROM COMMISSION MEMBERS:
Rayho wishes everyone a Merry Christmas. Forneris thanks Bechtle for stepping in for her today.
ITEMS FOR NEXT AGENDA:
Birtwistle Chiropractic (508 W Main) Rezoning; Recreational Cannabis Dispensary (1079 Collinsville Crossing) Rezoning, Site Plan, Text Amendment; Ardent Spirits Phase 1 (E Clay Street) Site Plan
ADJOURNMENT:
Motion to adjourn made by Jackstadt, seconded by Illies. Vote: All Ayes (5-0).
Motion Approved.
Adjournment at 9:55 p.m.
https://collinsville.granicus.com/DocumentViewer.php?file=collinsville_4ea7fb8f548cdb344cb43c52e77551bf.pdf&view=1
Alerts Sign-up